<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Alex&#039;s Soapbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thesandbox.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net</link>
	<description>Macintosh User and Bicycle Rider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second Largest Oil Field by Oilfield Forum</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2010/03/22/second-largest-oil-field/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oilfield Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thesandbox.net/?p=762#comment-416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello there, I found your website via Google at the same time as searching for a comparable topic, your web site got here up, it seems to be great. I&#039;ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
I&#039;m no longer certain the place you&#039;re getting your information, but good topic. I must spend some time studying much more or figuring out more. Thanks for wonderful info I used to be in search of this info for my mission.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, I found your website via Google at the same time as searching for a comparable topic, your web site got here up, it seems to be great. I&#8217;ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.<br />
I&#8217;m no longer certain the place you&#8217;re getting your information, but good topic. I must spend some time studying much more or figuring out more. Thanks for wonderful info I used to be in search of this info for my mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora to GyazMail by Eulogy for Eudora</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/site-graph/eudora-to-gyazmail/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eulogy for Eudora]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/site-graph/eudora-to-gyazmail/#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have created a separate page showing what I did to import years of Eudora email into GyazMail. I did not import filters nor nicknames/address books. My filters are simple and I had already [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have created a separate page showing what I did to import years of Eudora email into GyazMail. I did not import filters nor nicknames/address books. My filters are simple and I had already [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone + 2 by iPhone + 2 &#124; Phone Tips</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2009/07/03/iphone-2/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone + 2 &#124; Phone Tips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20090703_iphone-2/#comment-167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Original post: iPhone + 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: iPhone + 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Irrelevance of Microsoft by Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2009/02/23/the-irrelevance-of-microsoft/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20090223_the-irrelevance-of-microsoft/#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no problem with positive contributions by Microsoft. Their contributions to the AJAX technique that makes Web 2.0 possible is appreciated. It&#039;s only their products and business practices that stifle innovation and competition that I have a problem with. They&#039;re welcome to put as much of their software under the GNU license as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with positive contributions by Microsoft. Their contributions to the AJAX technique that makes Web 2.0 possible is appreciated. It&#8217;s only their products and business practices that stifle innovation and competition that I have a problem with. They&#8217;re welcome to put as much of their software under the GNU license as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Irrelevance of Microsoft by not a ms lover</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2009/02/23/the-irrelevance-of-microsoft/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[not a ms lover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20090223_the-irrelevance-of-microsoft/#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very happy but not very accurate realization. Dig deeper.... You can start with studying the butterfly effect theory or the history of computer science to realize the true relevance of MS to our lives. There are just a few software developing empires like MS that build the future of the technology, forget their broken Windows :) that you are not using anymore ;)
See the fast growing technology is being build on top of their ideas, and as the result of their visions. I am not a MS lover, neither a MAC lover but finally could convince myself to appreciate what both have done and are doing instead of thinking which one is better, so I buy their products]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very happy but not very accurate realization. Dig deeper&#8230;. You can start with studying the butterfly effect theory or the history of computer science to realize the true relevance of MS to our lives. There are just a few software developing empires like MS that build the future of the technology, forget their broken Windows <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  that you are not using anymore <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
See the fast growing technology is being build on top of their ideas, and as the result of their visions. I am not a MS lover, neither a MAC lover but finally could convince myself to appreciate what both have done and are doing instead of thinking which one is better, so I buy their products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Steele on Gun Control by John Lofton, Recovering Republican</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2009/01/31/michael-steele-on-gun-control/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lofton, Recovering Republican]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20090131_michael-steele-on-gun-control/#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, might want to listen to my exclusive interview with Michael Steele and comment. Thanks. JL.

http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205

And forget, please, &quot;conservatism,&quot; please. It will not “save” us because it has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson&#039;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:

&quot;[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&quot;

Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).

John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
JLof@aol.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, might want to listen to my exclusive interview with Michael Steele and comment. Thanks. JL.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205</a></p>
<p>And forget, please, &#8220;conservatism,&#8221; please. It will not “save” us because it has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson&#8217;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).</p>
<p>John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com<br />
Recovering Republican<br />
<a href="mailto:JLof@aol.com">JLof@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Terabyte by Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2005/12/04/one-terabyte/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/?p=310#comment-127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got about 2 terabytes right now - the 300Gb+250Gb from above and have added a 750Gb and a 500Gb. Add the 160Gb internal on my Mac and I&#039;ve got just under 2Tb, and that&#039;s not counting the 300Gb spread out across 6 bare drives.

I only have two of the four cases above. One broke down and I don&#039;t know where the other one is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got about 2 terabytes right now &#8211; the 300Gb+250Gb from above and have added a 750Gb and a 500Gb. Add the 160Gb internal on my Mac and I&#8217;ve got just under 2Tb, and that&#8217;s not counting the 300Gb spread out across 6 bare drives.</p>
<p>I only have two of the four cases above. One broke down and I don&#8217;t know where the other one is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Terabyte by K. Oster</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2005/12/04/one-terabyte/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Oster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/?p=310#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any storage solution update in the 3+ years since this blog post?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any storage solution update in the 3+ years since this blog post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Million Jobs Lost by David Ashley</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2008/12/24/two-million-jobs-lost/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Ashley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20081224_two-million-jobs-lost/#comment-161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read somewhere that WWI, before the US got involved, was winding down in a big stalemate. A truce would have been reached. But Wilson decided to involve the USA in the conflict, and that prolonged the war, drastically increased the death toll, and paved the way for ruinous war reparations that demoralized the German people, paving the way for a Hitler to take power...

It&#039;s nice to see more people becoming aware the business as usual is simply not possible anymore these days!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere that WWI, before the US got involved, was winding down in a big stalemate. A truce would have been reached. But Wilson decided to involve the USA in the conflict, and that prolonged the war, drastically increased the death toll, and paved the way for ruinous war reparations that demoralized the German people, paving the way for a Hitler to take power&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see more people becoming aware the business as usual is simply not possible anymore these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More GOP Hypocrisy by Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesandbox.net/2009/01/08/more-gop-hypocrisy/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesandbox.net/arm/blog/index.php/20090108_more-gop-hypocrisy/#comment-163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not? She&#039;s the Republican version of Hillary Clinton. I&#039;d love for her to run in 2012, 2016, and every four years hence :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not? She&#8217;s the Republican version of Hillary Clinton. I&#8217;d love for her to run in 2012, 2016, and every four years hence <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

